Ethics

Deontological honorable theories do non work in practice. set this view Firstly, deontological good theories argon honorable theories which maintain that the rightness or wrongness of an movement depends on its intrinsic qualities and not on the consequences of the action. They are the opposite of consequentialist theories as these theories judge the rightness or wrongness of an action by the consequence of that action. For example, lying is pleasing as long as the consequences of telling that lie are positive. One of the most widely known deontological theories is Kantian chastes. This ethical theory is concerned with duty for dutys sake. Everything we do should be done reveal of duty and we should not do it for whatever other reason. When employ to the issuing of embryology Kantian ethical motive would say that the lieu of the embryo is vital in deciding whether the research is morally gratifying or unacceptable.

Assuming that the consideration of the embryo was that it is considered gentleman because Kantian ethics would be against embryology as it would go against our duty to others which is to continuously treat homo as ends in themselves rather than as a fashion to an end. This deontological clay places high value and grandeur on sympathetic livelihood and therefore it will ceaselessly be against any action which could harm a gay being. In addition, when address with the issue of human experimentation, Kantian ethics would condemn this as humanity are autonomous demythologised agents and should be do by with the utmost respect. However if the human is considered brain dead accordingly it is acceptable according to Kantian ethics to experiment on human subjects. Natural moral law, another deontological theory would go against thisIf you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper